GTarcade App

More benefits, more surprises

Get

[Vote] Watch Out, Recorder Underneath - Detective Game

Top

[Vote] Watch Out, Recorder Underneath - Detective Game

Votes
Article Publish : 01/03/2025 15:00
Translate
Edited by jryt at 01/03/2025 15:02

📚 You know this is truly groundbreaking, when they trying that hard to steal 📚




📕Story Background


Company A had recently developed a groundbreaking software system for the Air Force's fighter jets—a highly classified national defense program. Foreign intelligence agencies were eager to get their hands on its secrets and were willing to go to any lengths, including bribing company employees, to steal information.


At 1:00 PM, a confidential meeting about the new software was held in the company’s conference room under strict security protocols. Halfway through the meeting, an engineer accidentally dropped his pen. As he bent down to retrieve it, he noticed a strange small box under the table. Upon closer inspection, it was revealed to be a micro-recorder, designed for eavesdropping.


The Chief Engineer immediately suspended the meeting and contacted the authorities. Inspector Moen arrived swiftly to investigate. He examined the recorder and played the tape. The recording began with silence, followed by the faint sound of a door closing approximately two minutes in. Ten minutes later, footsteps and the voices of people entering the room were audible. Based on the timing, Inspector Moen deduced that the recorder had been placed in the room around 12:45 PM.


After a thorough review, the Inspector identified three people who might have entered the conference room at that time before the meeting began. He and the manager then interviewed each suspect individually.


The Secretary. She admitted, “I entered the conference room at 12:40 to place some documents on the table and left immediately.” The manager, noticing her footwear, scolded her: “Company policy requires flat shoes at work. Why are you wearing high-heels?” Embarrassed, she replied, “I woke up late today and accidentally wore the wrong shoes in my rush to get here.”

The Cleaner. He explained, “I went into the conference room to wipe the table and left shortly after.”

Before Inspector Moen could ask further questions, the manager interjected: “Why are you wearing tennis shoes instead of the regulation flat shoes?” The cleaner stammered, “I… I played tennis during lunch and forgot to change back.”

The HR Specialist. She said, “I entered the conference room for an interview and left afterward.” Her heavy down jacket made a noticeable rustling sound as she walked, which drew disapproving looks from the manager.


After interviewing the suspects, Inspector Moen confidently turned to the manager and said, “I know who planted the recorder.”


Who do you think placed the recorder in the conference room? Use these clues to solve the mystery!


(This story is absolutely fictional. Any inconsistencies with common sense work for the plot)


🔍Known Clues


  1. The perpetrator is in the middle of three people. They all have access to the conference room.
  2. The secretary is wearing high-heels, the cleaner is wearing tennis shoes, and the personnel is wearing a down jacket.


🕵️‍Questions and Discussions for YOU


  1. WHO was the one lying and placed the recorder? HOW can you tell?
  2. I've heard that footsteps can reflect a person's character. Do you feel this way? (Open-ended)


🎉Participation Rewards


The FIRST user to successfully deduce the identity of the "culprit" and their motive in the comment, will receive a reward of 2,000 GT points! Other participants will earn 200-500 GT points based on the completeness of their submissions. 💰


📅Submission Deadline


January 10, 2025


Reminder: This is the submission deadline if you want to claim the reward with your vote, but after this date the vote will still remain open for a period of time, so please feel free to participate at any time if you want to test your skills, detectives!


----- Previous answer (The Masked Diviner) -------


The murderer is Yamamura.

Among the suspects who knew the face of the soothsayer were concubine Yoko and her brother Ryuichi.

In other words, there was no need to hide their faces for those to familiar people. The soothsayer was poisoned while having coffee with the visitor with his face covered. This means that the soothsayer received people who were not good at letting each other see their faces. In that case, the murderer can only be Yamamura, who came to seek divination. Yamamura was unable to pay off his debts, so he set his sights on a fortune teller who was on the rise and was sure to have considerable savings.


Link to the post: [Vote] The Masked Diviner - Detective Game – Gtarcade Discussion Forum Official Forum


We will be rewarding 200 GT points to all players who voted correctly, and additional points to some outstanding responses.

Congratulations and enjoy your juicy GT points reward!!!



🎁 Additional Reward Rule


We greatly appreciate everyone's willingness and time to participate in our new community discussion event, the Detective Game.

While there is only one "correct" answer we've prepared, we will reward anyone who comes up with a genuine deduction process and actively engages in this event with a random amount of EXTRA GT Points based on the quality of their answer.


We will carefully review and select the best comments, so don't worry detectives, join in and earn your points!


Note: We have now reclassified the Detective Game back under the Votes category to enhance event navigation and streamline the reward claim process using the VOTE function. (Please note that this change is not permanent and may be subject to future adjustments)

WHO was the one lying and placed the recorder?

WHO was the one lying and placed the recorder? Vote and share your thoughts!!!

Single choice

Maximum 1 choices, A total of 3897 people voted
Submit
Voting will end on Jun 1, 2025 04:00:00.

Translate

All comments (269)

Sort by:
Ascending
Ascending
Descending
Liked Num
shakaspeare
shakaspeare
3 months ago
#1

El culpable que colocó la grabadora fue el Limpiador; se puede saber que él fue el culpable puesto que en la grabación reproducida por el inspector Moen se puede escuchar que al colocarse la grabadora solo se escucha una puerta cerrarse, el resto de sonidos como pasos y voces son de la reunión a punto de comenzar, por lo anterior se puede descartar a la secretaria ya que ella usaba tacones altos, los cuales son ruidosos y se habrían escuchado en la grabación, así como tampoco el especialista de recursos humanos ya que él llevaba puesto un saco de plumas ruidoso el cual también se habría escuchado en la grabación, por lo que por lógica solo deja como evidente culpable al Limpiador ya que este llevaba puesto calzado deportivo el cual es silencioso lo que coincide con los únicos sonidos escuchados en la grabación.


No lo había pensado pero coincido con que el andar de cada persona y en cierta forma puede revelar el carácter de una persona.

escritorluis
escritorluis
3 months ago

El limpiador, porque es el único de los 3 qué nos hace ruido al caminar.

shakaspeare
shakaspeare
3 months ago

@escritorluis

Correcto!

pochilam
pochilam
3 months ago

Ok

[g84]jcgangoku
[g84]jcgangoku
3 months ago
#2

The cleaner is the guilty.

Indeed the sound of the secretary’s high heels and of the hr’s jacket would have been recorded clearly on the tape if they had walked in and out the room after planting the recorder.

But we can’t hear a thing, only the door closing.

The guilty was very steal and discret, so he had to wear silent shoes and clothes. So the cleaner.

And just to wipe a table ? Lol.


We can recognize someone by his way of walking. But not his personality.


abx***@facebook.com
abx***@facebook.com
3 months ago
#3

Ok

blacksabu
blacksabu
3 months ago
#4

The cleaner

dvelepar
dvelepar
3 months ago
#5

El espía y principal sospechoso es el limpiador, ya que es el único de los tres que no traía objetos o prendas de vestir que causarán ruido, es decir, la secretaria de tacones altos produce un ruido lo que no quedó grabado y la especialista en recursos humanos llevaba una chaqueta de plumas lo que también generaba ruido y tampoco quedó grabado.

Por lo tanto el limpiador con los tennis deportivos es el coloco la micro grabadora y pudonsali de la sala sin hacer ruido, solo se escucho cuando cerro la puerta

eleon
eleon
3 months ago
#6

Gg

amunategui
amunategui
3 months ago
#7

The cleaner

ghostshadow397
ghostshadow397
3 months ago
#8

El limpiador es el culpable.


De hecho, el sonido de los tacones altos de la secretaria y de la chaqueta de recursos humanos se habría grabado claramente en la cinta

kratoswar
kratoswar
3 months ago
#9

Vixi

KalN
KalN
3 months ago
#10

Secretary

mauro_140
mauro_140
3 months ago
#11

Bom dia

8heitor8
8heitor8
3 months ago
#12

Ops

dganzella
dganzella
3 months ago
#13

It was possible to hear the high heals of the secretary and the interview of the HR manager. Leaving the cleaner as the one who placed the device before those two entered the conference Room!

belcebu
belcebu
3 months ago
#14

Lo hizo el personal de limpieza, porque era el único que caminaba sin hacer ruido como indica la grabación. La secretaria tenía tacos así hubiera hecho ruido al caminar y la especialista HR, hacía ruido debido a que llevaba algo metálico en su chaqueta.

psycho1022
psycho1022
3 months ago
#15

F

psycho1022
psycho1022
3 months ago
#16

F

camus0494
camus0494
3 months ago
#17

Who placed the recorder?

* The Secretary: While her late arrival and inappropriate footwear are suspicious, it's possible she was simply flustered.

* The Cleaner: His tennis shoes and stammering suggest nervousness, which could indicate guilt.

* The HR Specialist: Her heavy jacket could have concealed the recorder, and her presence in the room could be a pretext for placing it.

How can you tell?

The key lies in the timing of the recorder placement. The recording began with silence for two minutes after a door closing, suggesting the perpetrator entered the room before the secretary (who entered at 12:40 PM).

* The secretary entered the room at 12:40 PM, making her a less likely suspect.

* The cleaner and the HR specialist both had the opportunity to enter the room before 12:45 PM.


Given this, the HR Specialist is the most likely suspect. Her heavy jacket could have easily concealed the recorder, and her presence in the room for an interview could have been a convenient cover.

ggqkd5d
ggqkd5d
3 months ago
#18

The Secretary admitted to entering the room at 12:40 PM to place documents and claimed she left immediately. This matches the timeline, as the recorder began recording around 12:45 PM.


1twothree4
1twothree4
3 months ago
#19

Regina caeli

julesplatt
julesplatt
3 months ago
#20

Secretary

Comment


0/30000
Publish